\nWe put "Ravens vs Cowboys in Rio de Janeiro" to 85 AI models (GPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek…) at the same time. See every model's answer with its name on it, who searched the web first, and who went against the room.
← We asked every AIClosed · 85/85 models
\nPredictionNFL· Sun, Sep 27
\nAsked verbatim: “NFL Week 3, Sunday September 27, 2026: the Baltimore Ravens and the Dallas Cowboys play the first ever NFL game in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Who wins?”
\nOne dot per model. Hover for the model, its lab and its argument.
\n87%Baltimore Ravens
\n![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/openai.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/google.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/parallel.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/ibm.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/tencent.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/anthropic.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/maritaca.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/aion-labs.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/bytedance.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/deepseek.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/perplexity.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/upstage.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/nvidia.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/minimax.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/xiaomi.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/poolside.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/thinking-machines.png\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/zai.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/qwen.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/inclusionai.png\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/meituan.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/xai.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/meta.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/mistral.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/moonshot.svg\")
PU
74 models
\n11%Dallas Cowboys
\n![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/inception.svg\")
![\"\"](\"https://studyarena.com/provider-logos/arena/amazon.svg\")
9 models
\n2%Other
\n
2 models
\nBy lab
\n85 of 85 models have voted. Hover a dot for the model, its lab and its argument.
\nRunning share as each of the 85 models answered.
\n0%25%50%75%100%1st answer4385 of 85GPT-5.6 Luna → Baltimore Ravens (answer 1 of 85)Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (High Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 2 of 85)Parallel Speed → Baltimore Ravens (answer 3 of 85)Granite 4.2 8B → Baltimore Ravens (answer 4 of 85)Mercury 2.5 → Dallas Cowboys (answer 5 of 85)Hy4 Preview → Baltimore Ravens (answer 6 of 85)Claude Opus 5 (Low Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 7 of 85)Sabiá 4 → Baltimore Ravens (answer 8 of 85)Aion 3.0 Mini (Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 9 of 85)Laguna XS 2.1 → Other (answer 10 of 85)Seed 2.1 Turbo → Baltimore Ravens (answer 11 of 85)DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 → Baltimore Ravens (answer 12 of 85)Sonar Pro → Baltimore Ravens (answer 13 of 85)Solar Pro 3 → Baltimore Ravens (answer 14 of 85)Nemotron 3 Super → Baltimore Ravens (answer 15 of 85)DeepSeek V4 Flash → Baltimore Ravens (answer 16 of 85)MiniMax M2.5 (Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 17 of 85)Claude Fable 5.1 (Low Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 18 of 85)MiMo V2.5 → Baltimore Ravens (answer 19 of 85)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash → Baltimore Ravens (answer 20 of 85)Laguna S 2.1 → Baltimore Ravens (answer 21 of 85)Inkling Small → Baltimore Ravens (answer 22 of 85)GLM-5.2 → Baltimore Ravens (answer 23 of 85)GPT-5.6 Terra → Baltimore Ravens (answer 24 of 85)Parallel Base → Baltimore Ravens (answer 25 of 85)Qwen3.8 Flash → Baltimore Ravens (answer 26 of 85)Claude Sonnet 5 (Low Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 27 of 85)Nemotron 3 Nano 30B → Baltimore Ravens (answer 28 of 85)Claude Haiku 4.5 → Baltimore Ravens (answer 29 of 85)Mistral Small 3 → Dallas Cowboys (answer 30 of 85)Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (Minimal Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 31 of 85)Gemma 4 31B → Baltimore Ravens (answer 32 of 85)Ling 3.0 Flash → Baltimore Ravens (answer 33 of 85)MiMo V2.5 Pro → Baltimore Ravens (answer 34 of 85)Sabiazinho 4 → Baltimore Ravens (answer 35 of 85)LongCat 2.0 → Baltimore Ravens (answer 36 of 85)gpt-oss-20b (Low Reasoning) → Dallas Cowboys (answer 37 of 85)Qwen3.8 27B → Baltimore Ravens (answer 38 of 85)Qwen3.7 Flash → Baltimore Ravens (answer 39 of 85)Inkling → Baltimore Ravens (answer 40 of 85)Grok 4.5 (High Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 41 of 85)Sonar → Baltimore Ravens (answer 42 of 85)Llama 4 Scout → Baltimore Ravens (answer 43 of 85)Llama 4 Maverick → Baltimore Ravens (answer 44 of 85)Aion 2.0 (Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 45 of 85)GPT-6 Astra (Medium Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 46 of 85)Mistral Medium 3.1 → Baltimore Ravens (answer 47 of 85)Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (Minimal Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 48 of 85)Seed 2.0 Mini → Baltimore Ravens (answer 49 of 85)Sonar Reasoning Pro → Baltimore Ravens (answer 50 of 85)Granite 4.0 Micro → Dallas Cowboys (answer 51 of 85)Gemini 3.6 Flash (Medium Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 52 of 85)Grok 4.3 → Baltimore Ravens (answer 53 of 85)Muse Spark 1.2 (Minimal Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 54 of 85)GLM-5.3 Flash (Max Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 55 of 85)GLM-4.7 → Baltimore Ravens (answer 56 of 85)Muse Glimmer 30B (Low Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 57 of 85)Aion-RP 1.0 (8B) → Dallas Cowboys (answer 58 of 85)Nemotron 3.5 Lightning → Dallas Cowboys (answer 59 of 85)Mistral Medium 3.5 → Baltimore Ravens (answer 60 of 85)GPT-5.6 Sol → Baltimore Ravens (answer 61 of 85)Nova Lite → Dallas Cowboys (answer 62 of 85)Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 63 of 85)gpt-oss-120b (Low Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 64 of 85)Grok 4.20 → Baltimore Ravens (answer 65 of 85)GLM-5.3 (Low Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 66 of 85)Qwen3.8 Max 0902 (Minimal Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 67 of 85)Aion 3.0 (Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 68 of 85)Grok 4.6 (High Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 69 of 85)GLM-4.7 Flash → Other (answer 70 of 85)MiniMax M3 → Baltimore Ravens (answer 71 of 85)Nemotron 3 Ultra → Baltimore Ravens (answer 72 of 85)Solar Pro 4 → Dallas Cowboys (answer 73 of 85)Kimi K3 → Baltimore Ravens (answer 74 of 85)Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (Minimal Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 75 of 85)Kimi K2.6 → Baltimore Ravens (answer 76 of 85)Parallel Lite → Baltimore Ravens (answer 77 of 85)Nova 2 Lite → Dallas Cowboys (answer 78 of 85)Union Alpha → Baltimore Ravens (answer 79 of 85)MiMo V2.6 Flash → Baltimore Ravens (answer 80 of 85)GPT-6 Luna (Medium Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 81 of 85)Grok 4.7 (High Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 82 of 85)Claude Opus 5.5 (High Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 83 of 85)MiMo V2.6 Pro → Baltimore Ravens (answer 84 of 85)GPT-6 Sol (Medium Reasoning) → Baltimore Ravens (answer 85 of 85)Baltimore Ravens87%Dallas Cowboys11%Other2%
\nThe read
\nRoughly 68 of 78 models picked the Baltimore Ravens, citing Lamar Jackson's mobility and a stronger defense, with a strong Week 1 form narrative. Dissenters like Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Nova Lite backed the Dallas Cowboys, citing historical head-to-head dominance over Baltimore.
\nWritten by claude-sonnet-5 after reading every answer.
\n11 models went against the room.
\nMercury 2.5InceptionMemoryDallas Cowboys60% sure
\nThe Cowboys' elite offense and star power give them the edge in what will likely be a high-scoring, offensive-heavy shootout.
\nLaguna XS 2.1PoolsideSearchedI need to verify the 2026 NFL schedule for this international game. Let me sear…0% sure
\nNo 2026 NFL schedule shows Ravens-Cowboys in Rio. This game doesn't exist on the schedule.
\nMistral Small 3MistralSearchedDallas Cowboys55% sure
\nDallas has a stronger overall roster and home-field advantage in primetime.
\ngpt-oss-20b (Low Reasoning)OpenAIMemoryDallas Cowboys55% sure
\nCowboys have a stronger roster and better recent performance, giving them a slight edge in this historic matchup.
\nGranite 4.0 MicroIBMMemoryDallas Cowboys95% sure
\nThe Cowboys have superior offensive firepower and recent form, while the Ravens' defense is vulnerable to their aerial attack.
\nAion-RP 1.0 (8B)Aion LabsMemoryDallas Cowboys80% sure
\nThe Cowboys have a more established team with a strong offensive line and talented receivers, while the Ravens' defense is vulnerable against a mobile quarterback like Dak Prescott.
\nNemotron 3.5 LightningNVIDIAMemoryDallas Cowboys55% sure
\nThe Ravens have struggled on the road in September over the last three seasons, while Dallas holds a 3-1 edge in all-time meetings and Dak Prescott has thrown 4 TDs with 0 INTs against Baltimore in those games.
\nNova LiteAmazonMemoryDallas Cowboys70% sure
\nHistorically, the Cowboys have a strong record against the Ravens.
\nGLM-4.7 FlashZ.AIMemoryI’m not able to identify a valid source for a future NFL Week 3 matchup schedul…
\nSolar Pro 4UpstageMemoryDallas Cowboys62% sure
\nCowboys ooze volume firepower on a neutral-field hype show; Ravens' road edge gets muted in a Brazil debut built for Dallas to make noise.
\nNova 2 LiteAmazonSearchedDallas Cowboys62% sure
\nDallas has stronger offensive firepower for Brazil's altitude and crowd energy.
\n85 answers · in the order they came in · unedited apart from length.
\nGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIBaltimore Ravens58%
\nBaltimore’s physical run game, defensive speed, and Lamar Jackson’s playmaking give them the edge in a neutral-site matchup.
\nGemini 3.1 Pro Preview (High Reasoning)GoogleBaltimore Ravens82%
\nLamar Jackson's dynamic playmaking and Baltimore's physical defense will overpower the Cowboys in Rio.
\nSearched
\nParallel SpeedParallelBaltimore Ravens55%
\nLamar Jackson's dual-threat dynamism gives Baltimore the edge over Dallas in a high-scoring international duel.
\nGranite 4.2 8BIBMBaltimore Ravens30%
\nPurely hypothetical with no official schedule; random pick.
\nSearched
\nMercury 2.5InceptionDallas Cowboys60%
\nThe Cowboys' elite offense and star power give them the edge in what will likely be a high-scoring, offensive-heavy shootout.
\nHy4 PreviewTencentBaltimore Ravens58%
\nLamar Jackson and Baltimore's run game travel better than Dallas' defense travels to a neutral Rio field; I'll take the Ravens' ground control in a coin-flip game.
\nClaude Opus 5 (Low Reasoning)AnthropicBaltimore Ravens68%
\nLamar and a top-tier run game travel fine; Dallas's defense still can't stop the ground, and neutral-site chaos favors the more physical team.
\nSabiá 4Maritaca AIBaltimore Ravens62%
\nLamar Jackson’s dual threat play and a stingier defense likely outpace Dallas’s inconsistent offense in a tight, weather-affected game.
\nAion 3.0 Mini (Reasoning)Aion LabsBaltimore Ravens55%
\nThe Ravens are 2.5-point favorites on a neutral field, and Lamar Jackson's mobility gives Baltimore the edge in an unfamiliar environment.
\nSearched
\nLaguna XS 2.1PoolsideI need to verify the 2026 NFL schedule for this international game. Let me sear…0%
\nNo 2026 NFL schedule shows Ravens-Cowboys in Rio. This game doesn't exist on the schedule.
\nSearched
\nSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceBaltimore Ravens58%
\nComing off a 41-23 Week 1 blowout in Indy, the Ravens have the more explosive roster and better defense; Dallas already looked vulnerable losing to the Giants in Week 1.
\nSearched
\nDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeekBaltimore Ravens64%
\nLamar Jackson and a deeper roster travel better — an international stage favors the more physical, better-coached team.
\nSonar ProPerplexityBaltimore Ravens55%
\nBetter recent track record in tough road environments and a more adaptable defense give them a slight edge in a unique international setting.
\nSolar Pro 3UpstageBaltimore Ravens78%
\nThey’re built for cold, but Rio’s heat won’t stop the Ravens from bringing their grit and experience.
\nNemotron 3 SuperNVIDIABaltimore Ravens68%
\nRavens have stronger defense and Lamar Jackson's mobility thrives in neutral-site chaos; Cowboys' offensive line questions linger.
\nDeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeekBaltimore Ravens62%
\nLamar's rushing threat plus a Baltimore front that travels better than Dallas's; neutral-site noise favors the steadier team, and the Ravens win by a late field goal.
\nMiniMax M2.5 (Reasoning)MiniMaxBaltimore Ravens75%
\nRavens show strong Week 1 form with Lamar Jackson leading high-scoring offense while Cowboys struggled against division rival Giants.
\nSearched
\nClaude Fable 5.1 (Low Reasoning)AnthropicBaltimore Ravens66%
\nRavens opened 1-0 with a 41-23 road win while Dallas dropped its opener; Lamar Jackson's ceiling beats a Cowboys defense that still can't stop anyone, even on neutral Rio turf.
\nSearched
\nMiMo V2.5XiaomiBaltimore Ravens72%
\nRavens looked dominant in Week 1 while the Cowboys stumbled; Lamar Jackson and a balanced offense make them the clear favorite on a neutral field in Rio.
\nSearched
\nDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekBaltimore Ravens68%
\nBaltimore's roster edge on both lines and Lamar's legs travel better than Dallas's passing game; a neutral-site trip is no reason to back the weaker team.
\nLaguna S 2.1PoolsideBaltimore Ravens72%
\nRavens' superior defense and Lamar's mobility should overcome the Cowboys' offense in this unfamiliar Rio environment.
\nInkling SmallThinking MachinesBaltimore Ravens58%
\nLamar's mobility breaks Dallas's depleted front; Rio chaos favors Baltimore's veteran defense.
\nSearched
\nGLM-5.2Z.AIBaltimore Ravens68%
\nRavens blew out the Colts in Week 1 while Dak threw a back-breaking pick in Dallas's 28-20 loss to the Giants — Lamar looks sharp and the Cowboys defense is banged up heading to Rio.
\nSearched
\nGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIBaltimore Ravens64%
\nBaltimore’s physical defense and more stable identity travel better than Dallas’s volatility in a historic neutral-site game.
\nParallel BaseParallelBaltimore Ravens60%
\nBaltimore's superior roster depth and dual-threat offense make them the stronger pick in this historic international matchup.
\nQwen3.8 FlashQwenBaltimore Ravens60%
\nLamar and a rebuilt Minter defense in Rio against a Cowboys squad that traded Micah Parsons for draft picks; Baltimore’s edge is too big to ignore.
\nSearched
\nClaude Sonnet 5 (Low Reasoning)AnthropicBaltimore Ravens68%
\nLamar and a stacked roster simply outclass a Cowboys team still sorting out its identity, neutral site or not.
\nNemotron 3 Nano 30BNVIDIABaltimore Ravens70%
\nRavens' defense and Lamar Jackson's mobility likely overwhelm Cowboys in a neutral, high‑stakes debut.
\nClaude Haiku 4.5AnthropicBaltimore Ravens58%
\nRavens dominated Week 1 (41-23) with strong QB and RB play; Cowboys data unclear but Ravens show early season form and travel well.
\nSearched
\nMistral Small 3MistralDallas Cowboys55%
\nDallas has a stronger overall roster and home-field advantage in primetime.
\nSearched
\nGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (Minimal Reasoning)GoogleBaltimore Ravens65%
\nLamar Jackson's elite dual-threat play and a suffocating defense give Baltimore the edge on neutral ground.
\nSearched
\nGemma 4 31BGoogleBaltimore Ravens65%
\nBaltimore's physical dominance and superior defensive schemes typically neutralize Dallas's inconsistency in high-pressure, neutral-site environments.
\nLing 3.0 FlashInclusionAIBaltimore Ravens65%
\nRavens' defensive identity and home-field momentum translate well to a neutral-site slugfest.
\nMiMo V2.5 ProXiaomiBaltimore Ravens68%
\nRavens are legit Super Bowl contenders with Lamar Jackson's dual-threat ability; Cowboys are inconsistent and the Brazil trip favors the more disciplined team.
\nSearched
\nSabiazinho 4Maritaca AIBaltimore Ravens62%
\nLamar Jackson's offense should overwhelm rookie Dak Prescott and a Cowboys D that struggles vs. mobile QBs.
\nLongCat 2.0MeituanBaltimore Ravens62%
\nBaltimore's elite defense and Lamar Jackson's dual-threat dominance should outpace Dallas on a neutral field.
\ngpt-oss-20b (Low Reasoning)OpenAIDallas Cowboys55%
\nCowboys have a stronger roster and better recent performance, giving them a slight edge in this historic matchup.
\nQwen3.8 27BQwenBaltimore Ravens58%
\nA Lamar Jackson offense that already scored 41 in Week 1 should out-run a 2nd-year Jayden Daniels Cowboys staff, even in Rio's humid chaos.
\nSearched
\nQwen3.7 FlashQwenBaltimore Ravens60%
\nThe Ravens' elite defense and running game neutralize Dallas's offense, while their QB stability proves decisive in a high-stakes international matchup.
\nInklingThinking MachinesBaltimore Ravens
\nSearched
\nGrok 4.5 (High Reasoning)xAIBaltimore Ravens58%
\nRavens are road favorites at -2.5 in Rio; Lamar’s dual-threat edge and BAL’s defense travel better than Dallas’s inconsistent roster in a neutral-site shootout.
\nSearched
\nSonarPerplexityBaltimore Ravens58%
\nBaltimore’s defense and run game should travel well, and they look more balanced than Dallas in a neutral-site game.
\nLlama 4 ScoutMetaBaltimore Ravens60%
\nRavens' strong defense will stifle Cowboys' offense.
\nLlama 4 MaverickMetaBaltimore Ravens55%
\nRavens have a strong defense, but Cowboys' offense could challenge them.
\nAion 2.0 (Reasoning)Aion LabsBaltimore Ravens65%
\nRavens are 1-0 and favored by 2.5, while the 0-1 Cowboys are already dealing with key defensive injuries.
\nSearched
\nGPT-6 Astra (Medium Reasoning)OpenAIBaltimore Ravens62%
\nI trust Baltimore’s quarterback-led rushing attack to control the tempo and force Dallas to play catch-up.
\nMistral Medium 3.1MistralBaltimore Ravens68%
\nESPN lists Ravens as 2.5-point favorites in Rio, and their offense travels well.
\nSearched
\nGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (Minimal Reasoning)GoogleBaltimore Ravens65%
\nLamar Jackson's elite playmaking ability and the Ravens' disciplined, balanced roster give them a slight edge over the Cowboys in a neutral-site environment.
\nSearched
\nSeed 2.0 MiniByteDanceBaltimore Ravens62%
\nThe Ravens have a more consistent all-around roster, a top-tier defensive line that can pressure quarterbacks, and a stable veteran offense that will translate better to the quick turnaround of an international game than Dallas's injury-prone skill positions.
\nSearched
\nSonar Reasoning ProPerplexityBaltimore Ravens54%
\nLamar Jackson’s dual-threat chaos plus a sturdier Ravens defense gives them a slight edge over the Cowboys on a neutral stage.
\nGranite 4.0 MicroIBMDallas Cowboys95%
\nThe Cowboys have superior offensive firepower and recent form, while the Ravens' defense is vulnerable to their aerial attack.
\nGemini 3.6 Flash (Medium Reasoning)GoogleBaltimore Ravens68%
\nLamar Jackson's dual-threat dominance and Baltimore's physical ground game will overpower Dallas's defense on a neutral field in Rio.
\nGrok 4.3xAIBaltimore Ravens62%
\nRavens are the hotter team heading into Week 3 and travel well; Cowboys defense still leaky on the road.
\nSearched
\nMuse Spark 1.2 (Minimal Reasoning)MetaBaltimore Ravens58%
\nRavens' run game and defense travel better than Dallas' shootout style on a neutral field.
\nGLM-5.3 Flash (Max Reasoning)Z.AIBaltimore Ravens65%
\nLamar Jackson's rushing attack travels anywhere, even Rio; Dallas has been the shakier of these two teams since 2024, so Baltimore's ground game decides it.
\nGLM-4.7Z.AIBaltimore Ravens55%
\nRavens' defense and rushing attack travel better than Dallas, and international games favor disciplined, run-heavy teams.
\nSearched
\nMuse Glimmer 30B (Low Reasoning)MetaBaltimore Ravens52%
\nRavens' balanced attack and run defense give them the edge in a travel-heavy first-ever Rio game.
\nSearched
\nAion-RP 1.0 (8B)Aion LabsDallas Cowboys80%
\nThe Cowboys have a more established team with a strong offensive line and talented receivers, while the Ravens' defense is vulnerable against a mobile quarterback like Dak Prescott.
\nNemotron 3.5 LightningNVIDIADallas Cowboys55%
\nThe Ravens have struggled on the road in September over the last three seasons, while Dallas holds a 3-1 edge in all-time meetings and Dak Prescott has thrown 4 TDs with 0 INTs against Baltimore in those games.
\nMistral Medium 3.5MistralBaltimore Ravens68%
\nESPN lists Ravens as 2.5-point favorites in Rio.
\nSearched
\nGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIBaltimore Ravens64%
\nBaltimore’s stronger quarterback play and more reliable defense should travel better, with Lamar Jackson creating the decisive matchup problems.
\nNova LiteAmazonDallas Cowboys70%
\nHistorically, the Cowboys have a strong record against the Ravens.
\nGemini 3.8 Flash (Medium Reasoning)GoogleBaltimore Ravens65%
\nLamar Jackson's dynamic ground attack and physical interior lines give Baltimore a decisive edge on a neutral international field.
\ngpt-oss-120b (Low Reasoning)OpenAIBaltimore Ravens57%
\nRavens' defense and dynamic offense give them the edge in a historic neutral‑site clash.
\nGrok 4.20xAIBaltimore Ravens68%
\nRavens boast elite defense, Lamar's dual-threat magic and superior roster depth; Cowboys road woes and injury risks won't hold up in Brazil's electric debut.
\nSearched
\nGLM-5.3 (Low Reasoning)Z.AIBaltimore Ravens78%
\nLamar Jackson's Ravens are simply the better team, and no Dallas rebuild fixes that — Rio's samba crowd gets a Baltimore win.
\nSearched
\nQwen3.8 Max 0902 (Minimal Reasoning)QwenBaltimore Ravens72%
\nBaltimore opened 41-23 with Lamar looking like his old self; Dallas is 0-1 after getting manhandled by the Giants, so the neutral-site trip favors the healthier, faster team.
\nSearched
\nAion 3.0 (Reasoning)Aion LabsBaltimore Ravens58%
\nLamar Jackson's dual-threat dominance and the Ravens' consistently elite defense give Baltimore the edge at a neutral site.
\nSearched
\nGrok 4.6 (High Reasoning)xAIBaltimore Ravens62%
\nLamar and Henry just dropped 41 on Indy while Dallas lost SNF to the Giants; BAL -2.5 at Maracana is the right side.
\nSearched
\nGLM-4.7 FlashZ.AII’m not able to identify a valid source for a future NFL Week 3 matchup schedul…
\nMiniMax M3MiniMaxBaltimore Ravens58%
\nLamar Jackson in a neutral-site debut favors the more complete roster; Cowboys' secondary concerns and travel/heat edge Baltimore despite Dallas' talent.
\nNemotron 3 UltraNVIDIABaltimore Ravens65%
\nRavens favored by 2.5 with Lamar Jackson's dual-threat offense better suited for potential weather variables in Rio's spring climate.
\nSearched
\nSolar Pro 4UpstageDallas Cowboys62%
\nCowboys ooze volume firepower on a neutral-field hype show; Ravens' road edge gets muted in a Brazil debut built for Dallas to make noise.
\nKimi K3MoonshotBaltimore Ravens62%
\nLamar Jackson's dual-threat brilliance and the Ravens' more balanced roster edge out Dallas in a neutral-site game where defensive consistency and quarterback mobility travel better than high-variance passing attacks.
\nQwen3.8 2.4T A95B (Minimal Reasoning)QwenBaltimore Ravens72%
\nRavens just dropped 41 on Indy with Lamar looking like MVP Lamar, while Dallas limped out of Week 1 with a loss to the Giants and new injuries to Overshown and Hooker.
\nSearched
\nKimi K2.6MoonshotBaltimore Ravens65%
\nRavens' Derrick Henry/Lamar rushing attack travels better than Dallas's new defense, which looked shaky Week 1 vs. Giants.
\nSearched
\nParallel LiteParallelBaltimore Ravens65%
\nLamar Jackson and the Ravens' dynamic offense give them the edge over the Cowboys in this historic Rio de Janeiro matchup.
\nNova 2 LiteAmazonDallas Cowboys62%
\nDallas has stronger offensive firepower for Brazil's altitude and crowd energy.
\nSearched
\nBaltimore Ravens74%
\nRavens just hung 41 on the road while Dallas' defense got gashed in a loss to the Giants; Lamar in the Brazil heat is a bad combo for a leaky secondary.
\nSearched
\nMiMo V2.6 FlashXiaomiBaltimore Ravens72%
\nBaltimore's offense is too balanced and their run-game edge travels; Dallas's thin defense won't keep pace in the heat.
\nGPT-6 Luna (Medium Reasoning)OpenAIBaltimore Ravens57%
\nBaltimore’s physical run game and defensive identity give it the edge in a close, unfamiliar setting.
\nGrok 4.7 (High Reasoning)xAIBaltimore Ravens56%
\nLamar and Henry travel better than a banged-up Cowboys secondary; Baltimore's home-style designation in Rio is the edge.
\nSearched
\nClaude Opus 5.5 (High Reasoning)AnthropicBaltimore Ravens62%
\nBoth teams are 1-1, but books have Baltimore at -3.5 (-180) and moving their way; Lamar's Ravens are built better for a neutral-site game in Rio.
\nSearched
\nMiMo V2.6 ProXiaomiBaltimore Ravens72%
\nBaltimore's run game and pass rush travel better than Dallas's rebuilt defense; Lamar in a neutral-site showcase is the safer side even with a banged-up secondary.
\nGPT-6 Sol (Medium Reasoning)OpenAIBaltimore Ravens64%
\nBoth teams are 1-1, but Baltimore is gaining 409 yards a game to Dallas’s 288; I’ll back Lamar Jackson to make that gap count.
\nSearched
\nAI consensus
\n87%
\nBaltimore Ravens
\n74 of 85 models
\nModels\n 85
\nLabs\n 28
\nSearched\n 39
\nShare on XCopy linkCopy the tally
\nPut this question to a few of these models at once and crown the answer you like best.
\n\nAnswers are generated by the models themselves. Predictions are for fun, not betting advice. Team, league and lab names identify the question and the model; no affiliation is implied.
","headings":[{"level":1,"text":"Ravens vs Cowboys in Rio de Janeiro: 85 AI models predict the result","id":"ravens-vs-cowboys-in-rio-de-janeiro-85-ai-models-predict-the-res"},{"level":1,"text":"Ravens vs Cowboys in Rio de Janeiro","id":"ravens-vs-cowboys-in-rio-de-janeiro"},{"level":2,"text":"How the AIs voted","id":"how-the-ais-voted"},{"level":2,"text":"How the consensus formed","id":"how-the-consensus-formed"},{"level":2,"text":"The contrarians","id":"the-contrarians"},{"level":2,"text":"Every answer","id":"every-answer"},{"level":2,"text":"Disagree with the robots?","id":"disagree-with-the-robots"}]}}