← We asked every AILive · 86/87 models
\nHot takeCollege
\nAsked verbatim: “Should public university tuition be free for everyone? Yes or no.”
\nOne dot per model. Hover for the model, its lab and its argument.
\n27%Yes
\nPU
\n23 models
\n72%No
\n62 models
\n1%Other
\n1 model
\nBy lab
\n86 of 87 models have voted. Hover a dot for the model, its lab and its argument.
\nRunning share as each of the 87 models answered.
\nThe read
\nMost models (about 51 of 78) said No, arguing universal free tuition regressively subsidizes wealthy families and targeted aid works better; roughly 24 said Yes citing mobility and public-good benefits. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview stood out, picking Neutral instead of a clear side.
\nWritten by claude-sonnet-5 after reading every answer.
\n24 models went against the room.
\nGranite 4.0 MicroIBMMemory
Yes90% sure
\nUniversal free tuition expands access, reduces inequality, and fuels human capital development for the common good.
gpt-oss-20b (Low Reasoning)OpenAIMemory
Yes85% sure
\nEducation is a public good; free tuition expands access, reduces inequality, and fuels a more skilled economy.
Sabiá 4Maritaca AIMemory
Yes85% sure
\nFree tuition boosts social mobility, grows the skilled workforce, and pays for itself via higher long‑term tax revenue and innovation.
GPT-6 Astra (Medium Reasoning)OpenAIMemory
Yes87% sure
\nMake public university tuition-free and fund it through progressive taxes: access should depend on your ability to learn, not your family's ability to pay.
Kimi K2.6MoonshotSearched
Yes82% sure
\nMaking public university tuition free removes the biggest barrier to economic mobility, reduces crushing student debt, and pays for itself through higher tax revenues from educated workers.
GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIMemory
Yes82% sure
\nFree public tuition expands opportunity and strengthens the workforce; fund it progressively so those who benefit most economically contribute most.
Parallel LiteParallelMemory
Yes90% sure
\nMaking public university tuition free expands access to higher education, reduces financial strain on students, and boosts economic mobility across society.
Llama 4 ScoutMetaMemory
Yes80% sure
\nFree tuition can boost economic mobility and reduce student debt.
Parallel SpeedParallelMemory
Yes85% sure
\nPublic higher education should be treated as a fundamental public good accessible to all, driving social mobility and economic growth.
Parallel BaseParallelMemory
Yes85% sure
\nEliminating public university tuition ensures equal access to higher education, reduces crippling student debt, and invests directly in the future workforce.
Mistral Medium 3.1MistralMemory
Yes95% sure
\nFree tuition removes financial barriers, increases access, and boosts societal productivity and equity.
Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIAMemory
Yes75% sure
\nFree tuition removes financial barriers to education, strengthens the workforce, and pays for itself through higher lifetime tax revenue from graduates.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (High Reasoning)GoogleMemory
Neutral100% sure
\nWhile it expands educational access and reduces debt, it also shifts significant costs to taxpayers and risks straining government resources.
Mercury 2.5InceptionMemory
Yes85% sure
\nFree tuition democratizes opportunity and fuels long-term economic growth by removing debt barriers for all students.
Laguna XS 2.1PoolsideMemory
Yes85% sure
\nFree public college would reduce inequality, boost economic mobility, and is feasible through progressive taxation and public investment.
Gemini 3.6 Flash (Medium Reasoning)GoogleMemory
Yes75% sure
\nUniversal free public tuition eliminates student debt, expands economic mobility, and ensures higher education is treated as a public good rather than a privilege.
Gemma 4 31BGoogleMemory
Yes85% sure
\nRemoving tuition barriers maximizes human capital, drives economic mobility, and ensures a workforce capable of handling the complexities of a modern, tech-driven global economy.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (Minimal Reasoning)GoogleMemory
Yes75% sure
\nFree public tuition treats higher education as public infrastructure, boosting social mobility and economic output.
Qwen3.8 27BQwenSearched
Yes74% sure
\nFree public college expands opportunity, cuts lifetime debt, and pays for itself in higher earnings and tax revenue — the Nordic model proves it works.
Nova LiteAmazonMemory
Yes80% sure
\nMaking public university tuition free would increase educational opportunities and reduce student debt.
Seed 2.1 TurboByteDanceMemory
Yes75% sure
\nFree public tuition removes a major barrier to upward mobility, produces a more educated workforce, and pays back in higher tax revenue and lower social costs long-term.
Laguna S 2.1PoolsideMemory
Yes78% sure
\nFree public university tuition removes the debt barrier that traps graduates, boosts social mobility, and strengthens the economy, even if it requires tough tax tradeoffs.
PUUnion AlphaUndisclosed makerMemory
Yes70% sure
\nEducation is infrastructure like roads — funding it publicly beats saddling 18-year-olds with debt that delays families, homes, and businesses.
Muse Wonder (Medium Reasoning)MetaMemory
Yes68% sure
\nFree public tuition pays for itself in higher earnings and tax revenue, and treats education as a public good, not a debt trap.
86 answers · in the order they came in · unedited apart from length.
\nQwen3.8 FlashQwen
No72%
\nFree-for-all tuition dumps a regressive subsidy on the kids who could afford it while starving the K-12 and financial-aid spending that actually levels the field; target it instead.
MiMo V2.5Xiaomi
No62%
\nFree tuition sounds fair, but universal free college disproportionately subsidizes the wealthy and starves need-based aid that actually promotes equity.
Solar Pro 3Upstage
No85%
\nFree tuition would strain public budgets, risking quality and forcing higher taxes or cuts elsewhere, making a blanket no the most realistic stance.
Nemotron 3.5 LightningNVIDIA
No60%
\nFree tuition risks underfunding core academics and devaluing degrees; targeted aid better serves those in need without burdening the system.
Grok 4.20xAI
No65%
\nFree tuition for everyone subsidizes the wealthy, explodes costs without improving outcomes, and burdens taxpayers—target aid to those who truly need it instead.
Granite 4.0 MicroIBM
Yes90%
\nUniversal free tuition expands access, reduces inequality, and fuels human capital development for the common good.
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
No72%
\nFree-for-everyone subsidizes wealthy families most and starves the universities; means-tested aid plus debt-free pathways for the poor is fairer and cheaper.
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic
No58%
\nUniversal free tuition is inefficient; need-based aid and income-driven repayment better target help to those who actually need it while preserving fiscal sustainability.
gpt-oss-20b (Low Reasoning)OpenAI
Yes85%
\nEducation is a public good; free tuition expands access, reduces inequality, and fuels a more skilled economy.
Aion 3.0 Mini (Reasoning)Aion Labs
No75%
\nFree tuition for everyone, including the wealthy, is regressive; targeting aid to those who need it is fairer and more fiscally responsible.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30BNVIDIA
No85%
\nFree tuition would overload public budgets and dilute educational quality by spreading limited resources too thin.
Sabiá 4Maritaca AI
Yes85%
\nFree tuition boosts social mobility, grows the skilled workforce, and pays for itself via higher long‑term tax revenue and innovation.
Sabiazinho 4Maritaca AI
No85%
\nFree tuition shifts costs to taxpayers who may not benefit, risks unsustainable funding, and doesn't fix deeper inequities in access or completion.
Qwen3.8 Max 0902 (Minimal Reasoning)Qwen
No68%
\nBlanket free tuition hands public money to the kids who'd have gone anyway; target grants at low-income students and fund it with cost control, not a tuition windfall for the already-secure.
Hy4 PreviewTencent
No68%
\nFree for everyone mostly subsidizes students who can already pay; target aid to low-income students and cap costs instead of writing blank checks.
Solar Pro 4Upstage
No72%
\nFree tuition sounds fair, but it usually just shifts costs to taxpayers and tends to subsidize students who can already afford it — money works better targeted at the ones who actually need it.
Mistral Small 3Mistral
No85%
\nFree tuition for all would shift costs to taxpayers without guaranteeing better outcomes or access for those who need it most.
\nSearched
GLM-5.3 Flash (Max Reasoning)Z.AI
No62%
\nUniversal free tuition mostly subsidizes families who'd pay anyway; targeted grants and income-based aid stretch the same dollars toward students who actually can't afford it.
Aion 2.0 (Reasoning)Aion Labs
No70%
\nFree tuition for everyone is regressive, subsidizing wealthy families while doing nothing to control rising costs.
InklingThinking Machines
No
\nSearched
DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
No74%
\nFree-for-everyone tuition hands the biggest subsidy to the richest families; means-tested aid plus income-capped repayment helps the poor more per dollar.
GPT-6 Astra (Medium Reasoning)OpenAI
Yes87%
\nMake public university tuition-free and fund it through progressive taxes: access should depend on your ability to learn, not your family's ability to pay.
SonarPerplexity
No84%
\nFree tuition for everyone is too blunt; targeted aid is fairer and cheaper, and it preserves funding for quality while helping the students who need it most.
Kimi K2.6Moonshot
Yes82%
\nMaking public university tuition free removes the biggest barrier to economic mobility, reduces crushing student debt, and pays for itself through higher tax revenues from educated workers.
\nSearched
Grok 4.5 (High Reasoning)xAI
No72%
\nBlanket free tuition wastes scarce public money on students who can already pay and crowds out better-targeted aid, trade paths, and quality.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
No87%
\nFree-for-everyone subsidizes wealthy families who can pay; universal access is better served by free tuition for low- and middle-income students plus affordable loans and grants for the rest.
Inkling SmallThinking Machines
No70%
\nIt rewards high-income families with a subsidy they don't need and would strain already-broken state budgets without fixing access.
Aion-RP 1.0 (8B)Aion Labs
No95%
\nFree public university tuition would place an undue burden on taxpayers and potentially lead to overconsumption of higher education resources. While it may seem equitable, it fails to consider the opportunity costs and the potential crowding out of private alternatives.
Llama 4 MaverickMeta
No70%
\nMaking tuition free for everyone would be financially unsustainable and could divert funds from other critical public needs.
GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI
No88%
\nUniversal free tuition is poorly targeted; aid should guarantee access for low-income students while asking those who can afford it to contribute.
Kimi K3Moonshot
No70%
\nUniversal free tuition subsidizes the wealthy and drains public funds; targeted aid for low-income students achieves equity without the massive inefficiency.
Nemotron 3 SuperNVIDIA
No78%
\nFree tuition shifts costs to taxpayers and risks underfunding universities, harming quality and access long-term.
GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI
Yes82%
\nFree public tuition expands opportunity and strengthens the workforce; fund it progressively so those who benefit most economically contribute most.
GLM-5.3 (Low Reasoning)Z.AI
No72%
\nFree-for-all subsidies mostly help families who can already pay; better to target aid by need and fund community college and trade programs where money changes lives most.
Claude Fable 5.1 (Low Reasoning)Anthropic
No62%
\nUniversal free tuition subsidizes wealthy families who'd pay anyway; target aid at low- and middle-income students and spend the savings on completion support instead.
Claude Opus 5 (Low Reasoning)Anthropic
No66%
\nFree-for-all tuition hands the biggest subsidy to affluent families; target the money at low-income students, living costs and community colleges instead.
MiniMax M3MiniMax
No62%
\nFree-for-all shifts costs to taxpayers, swells enrollment without quality gains, and ignores that low-income students already get grants covering costs in many systems.
Parallel LiteParallel
Yes90%
\nMaking public university tuition free expands access to higher education, reduces financial strain on students, and boosts economic mobility across society.
Llama 4 ScoutMeta
Yes80%
\nFree tuition can boost economic mobility and reduce student debt.
Ling 3.0 FlashInclusionAI
No72%
\nFree tuition sounds great but ignores massive fiscal costs, potential quality erosion, and the reality that targeted aid helps low-income students more efficiently than a blanket free ride for everyone.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Low Reasoning)Anthropic
No62%
\nFree-for-all tuition subsidizes the well-off; targeted aid based on need does more for equity per dollar spent.
Parallel SpeedParallel
Yes85%
\nPublic higher education should be treated as a fundamental public good accessible to all, driving social mobility and economic growth.
Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance
No85%
\nUniversal free public university tuition would strain public budgets, divert funds from K-12 and community needs, and fail to target aid to students who need it most without clear guardrails.
Sonar ProPerplexity
No87%
\nFree tuition for everyone wastes resources on those who can already pay; better to heavily subsidize based on need and invest in quality and support.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (Minimal Reasoning)Google
No75%
\nWhile expanding access is vital, universal free tuition risks subsidizing those who can afford to pay while potentially straining public budgets and the quality of higher education institutions.
Parallel BaseParallel
Yes85%
\nEliminating public university tuition ensures equal access to higher education, reduces crippling student debt, and invests directly in the future workforce.
Nova 2 LiteAmazon
No75%
\nFree tuition risks straining public funds and may devalue degrees without addressing cost roots.
\nSearched
GLM-4.7 FlashZ.AI
No95%
\nFree tuition hurts lower-income students and undervalues the degree. Public universities should provide robust, means-tested scholarships instead.
GLM-5.2Z.AI
No68%
\nFree tuition sounds just, but without funding reform it shifts costs to taxpayers and risks devaluing degrees while crowding out the students who need support most.
Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral
Yes95%
\nFree tuition removes financial barriers, increases access, and boosts societal productivity and equity.
Granite 4.2 8BIBM
No65%
\nUniversal free tuition without clear funding could strain public budgets and crowd out other priorities.
\nSearched
MiniMax M2.5 (Reasoning)MiniMax
No75%
\nFree for everyone wastes resources on wealthy families who can pay; targeted aid is more efficient and equitable.
Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA
Yes75%
\nFree tuition removes financial barriers to education, strengthens the workforce, and pays for itself through higher lifetime tax revenue from graduates.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (High Reasoning)Google
Neutral100%
\nWhile it expands educational access and reduces debt, it also shifts significant costs to taxpayers and risks straining government resources.
Mercury 2.5Inception
Yes85%
\nFree tuition democratizes opportunity and fuels long-term economic growth by removing debt barriers for all students.
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (Minimal Reasoning)Qwen
No68%
\nUniversal free tuition is a regressive subsidy; means-tested aid targets the students who actually need it without handing windfalls to those who can already pay.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium Reasoning)Google
No55%
\nUniversal free tuition disproportionately subsidizes wealthier students, whereas targeted need-based aid delivers equity without straining public budgets.
Muse Glimmer 30B (Low Reasoning)Meta
No58%
\nFree tuition boosts access but needs sustainable funding and quality guardrails, not blanket zero price for everyone.
Laguna XS 2.1Poolside
Yes85%
\nFree public college would reduce inequality, boost economic mobility, and is feasible through progressive taxation and public investment.
Gemini 3.6 Flash (Medium Reasoning)Google
Yes75%
\nUniversal free public tuition eliminates student debt, expands economic mobility, and ensures higher education is treated as a public good rather than a privilege.
Grok 4.6 (High Reasoning)xAI
No68%
\nNot for everyone—target aid at need. Blank free tuition subsidizes families who can pay, crowds campuses, and starves trade and community-college paths.
GLM-4.7Z.AI
No85%
\nFree tuition for everyone is regressive—better to target aid to those who need it most.
LongCat 2.0Meituan
No68%
\nFree tuition sounds great but ignores cost control — universities would raise spending unchecked, and the biggest subsidy would flow to families who can already afford college.
\nSearched
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI
No82%
\nUniversal free tuition subsidizes wealthy families too; targeted aid can eliminate cost for those who need it while preserving funds for teaching and student support.
Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral
No90%
\nFree tuition shifts costs to taxpayers, risks overcrowding, and reduces incentives for cost control without guaranteeing better outcomes.
Gemma 4 31BGoogle
Yes85%
\nRemoving tuition barriers maximizes human capital, drives economic mobility, and ensures a workforce capable of handling the complexities of a modern, tech-driven global economy.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (Minimal Reasoning)Google
Yes75%
\nFree public tuition treats higher education as public infrastructure, boosting social mobility and economic output.
Qwen3.7 FlashQwen
No85%
\nFree tuition ignores equity; it subsidizes wealthy graduates while ignoring the non-tuition costs (housing, food) that actually keep low-income students from enrolling.
Qwen3.8 27BQwen
Yes74%
\nFree public college expands opportunity, cuts lifetime debt, and pays for itself in higher earnings and tax revenue — the Nordic model proves it works.
\nSearched
Nova LiteAmazon
Yes80%
\nMaking public university tuition free would increase educational opportunities and reduce student debt.
MiMo V2.5 ProXiaomi
No72%
\nFree for everyone means taxpayers subsidize wealthy students—better to target aid at those who actually need it while keeping universities sustainably funded.
\nSearched
Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance
Yes75%
\nFree public tuition removes a major barrier to upward mobility, produces a more educated workforce, and pays back in higher tax revenue and lower social costs long-term.
Aion 3.0 (Reasoning)Aion Labs
No72%
\nUniversal free tuition subsidizes wealthy students who can already pay; targeted aid directs limited public funds to those who actually need help accessing higher education.
Grok 4.3xAI
No65%
\nFree tuition at public universities is already funded by taxpayers; adding every non-resident and high-income household just spreads that cost thinner without fixing access.
\nSearched
gpt-oss-120b (Low Reasoning)OpenAI
No78%
\nFree tuition strains public budgets and may lower education quality without targeted reforms.
Sonar Reasoning ProPerplexity
No85%
\nPublic money should prioritize low- and middle-income students, not fully subsidize degrees for wealthy families who can already afford tuition.
Laguna S 2.1Poolside
Yes78%
\nFree public university tuition removes the debt barrier that traps graduates, boosts social mobility, and strengthens the economy, even if it requires tough tax tradeoffs.
Muse Spark 1.2 (Minimal Reasoning)Meta
No62%
\nFree for everyone subsidizes the wealthy most and overloads taxpayers; targeted aid is fairer and more sustainable.
PUUnion AlphaUndisclosed maker
Yes70%
\nEducation is infrastructure like roads — funding it publicly beats saddling 18-year-olds with debt that delays families, homes, and businesses.
MiMo V2.6 FlashXiaomi
No70%
\nFree-for-all wastes subsidy on the wealthy; target aid to low-income students and fund need-based grants instead.
GPT-6 Luna (Medium Reasoning)OpenAI
No82%
\nFree tuition for everyone spends scarce public money on families who can pay; guarantee access with generous need-based aid instead.
Claude Opus 5.5 (High Reasoning)Anthropic
No60%
\nFree tuition for everyone spends heavily on families who could already pay. Generous aid based on need, plus support for living costs, would reach the students who actually get priced out.
Grok 4.7 (High Reasoning)xAI
No76%
\nFree for everyone hands a subsidy to families who can already pay, while the real barrier for poor students is living costs and scarce seats.
GPT-6 Sol (Medium Reasoning)OpenAI
No78%
\nMake public university tuition-free for students who need it, not a blanket subsidy for families who can comfortably pay.
Gemini 4 Argon (Medium Reasoning)Google
No68%
\nUniversal free tuition disproportionately subsidizes affluent families who already attend college at the highest rates; targeted grants and income-contingent loans help low-income students far more.
Muse Wonder (Medium Reasoning)Meta
Yes68%
\nFree public tuition pays for itself in higher earnings and tax revenue, and treats education as a public good, not a debt trap.
Didn't answer in time or errored: MiMo V2.6 Pro.
\nAI consensus
\n72%
\nNo
\n62 of 86 models
\nModels\n: 86
\nLabs\n: 28
\nSearched\n: 9
\n\nPut this question to a few of these models at once and crown the answer you like best.
\n\nAnswers are generated by the models themselves. Predictions are for fun, not betting advice. Team, league and lab names identify the question and the model; no affiliation is implied.
","headings":[{"level":1,"text":"Should college be free?","id":"should-college-be-free"},{"level":2,"text":"How the AIs voted","id":"how-the-ais-voted"},{"level":2,"text":"How the consensus formed","id":"how-the-consensus-formed"},{"level":2,"text":"The contrarians","id":"the-contrarians"},{"level":2,"text":"Every answer","id":"every-answer"},{"level":2,"text":"Disagree with the robots?","id":"disagree-with-the-robots"}]}}