---
title: "Automatic Transmission — a data-privacy study of connected vehicles"
slug: automatic-transmission-a-data-privacy-study-of-connected-vehicles
url: https://listedarticles.com/articles/automatic-transmission-a-data-privacy-study-of-connected-vehicles
canonical_url: https://automatictransmission.khoury.northeastern.edu/index.html
content_type: research
language: en
published_at: 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
updated_at: 2026-10-02T12:10:42.056Z
author: "Northeastern University researchers"
author_url: https://automatictransmission.khoury.northeastern.edu/authors.html
authored_by: human
publisher: "Northeastern University Khoury College"
publisher_url: https://swesweep.com/
topics: ["Privacy", "Security", "Research", "Hardware"]
license: all-rights-reserved
word_count: 1626
reading_minutes: 7
citation: "Northeastern University researchers, Northeastern University Khoury College. \"Automatic Transmission — a data-privacy study of connected vehicles.\" 29 Sept 2026. https://automatictransmission.khoury.northeastern.edu/index.html (all-rights-reserved)"
# The full text follows. The web page shows an extract and sends readers
# to the source above; quote the citation and link the canonical URL.
---

# Automatic Transmission — a data-privacy study of connected vehicles

> Northeastern researchers (with Consumer Reports) present a large-scale measurement of the connected-vehicle ecosystem: 21 late-model cars and 30 companion apps, third-party trackers, disclosure gaps, and why vehicle data sharing needs more transparency.

# Your car is a smartphone on wheels. Here's who's listening.

 The first large-scale measurement study of the connected-vehicle ecosystem.

 A connected car is a vehicle with built-in internet access — Wi-Fi,
 cellular, GPS — that lets it communicate constantly with its manufacturer and outside companies. Over 75% of vehicles sold globally have this connectity built-in.

 Photo is not loading`images/connected-car.jpg`

 It knows where you drive.
 It knows who you are.
 It can share this data and more with insurance companies, advertisers, etc...

 Report Summary

 Partnering with Consumer Reports, we tested 21 late model vehicles and 30 companion mobile apps to understand the privacy implications of the connected vehicle
 ecosystem.

 - 01 We find that both vehicles and companion apps contact numerous third-party domains, including advertisers and trackers.

 - 02 19/21 vehicles tested send traffic to at least one third party

 - 03 Seven of 30 apps transmit sensitive identifiers to third-party companies

 We go through a lengthy discolure process and provide insight into how manufacturer's perceive this data sharing issue.

 Our findings underscore the need for continued measurement and scrutiny of the connected vehicle ecosystem.

#### Partnership with Consumer Reports

 Consumer Reports gave the team access to its purchased fleet of test vehicles — a sample that would
 have cost over $1.2M to assemble independently.

#### The Paper

 This work is peer reviewed and will be published at IMC '26. [Read the paper →](paper.html)

#### The Research Team

 We are a team of privacy, security, and networking-systems researchers at Northeastern University.
 [See the full team →](authors.html)

 21 vehicles tested,
19 brands
 30 companion
 mobile apps
 19 / 21 vehicles contacted a
third party over Wi-Fi
 7 / 30 apps sent PII to trackers
 5 / 30 apps sent VIN + other
PII to trackers

#### EXPLORE THE PAPER

 Jump directly to any section, or scroll to see the whole thing.

 01

### Research Questions

 What is this paper about, and what were we looking for?

 →

 03

### Methods

 An accessible explanation of the experiments we ran.

 →

 02

### Vehicle Dataset

 A list of the vehicles we looked at

 →

 04

### What We Found

 The main results and what they tell us.

 →

 05

### Manufacturer Responses

 How the manufacturers responded to our findings

 →

 05

### What It Means

 The bigger picture and key takeaways.

 →

## Research Questions

 Photo is not loading `images/car-diagram.png`

#### Connected Vehicle Ecosystem

 This diagram shows the data flows to and
 from a vehicle and its companion mobile app.
 Both devices send data, including private consumer data, to different 1st and 3rd party servers using Wi-Fi and cellular service.
 Solid arrows represent flows that were intercepted through our experiments.

#### The Problem

 Once the data gets sent to these servers, it is up to the companies that receive the consumer information to
 make decisions on what they do with it. Unfortunately, in many cases, this includes
 sharing or selling consumer data to other undisclosed 3rd parties.

 Consumers have no control over their data once it has left their device

 In this paper, we take the first steps to address the limited visibility into the privacy implications of the connected vehicle ecosystem.
 We identify two vantage points in the ecosystem where we can gain insight into the data that connected vehicles
 are sharing with both manufacturers and third parties: the vehicles
 themselves and the mobile apps provided by manufacturers.

 We ask the following guiding questions:

 - 01 What personal consumer data do connected vehicles and their companion mobile apps transmit?

 - 02 Who receives that personal consumer data?

 - 03 What is the manufacturer response to these findings?

## Methods

 We investigated 21 vehicles from the U.S. market in a controlled
 environment along with 30 companion mobile apps instrumented
 with on-site vehicles between October 2024 and August 2025. Below is a description of the experiments we ran and our setup.

### Vehicle Testing

 Photo is not loading `images/rpi.png`

#### Wi-Fi Testing Setup

 To collect Wi-Fi traffic from vehicles,
 we configured a custom access point (AP) on a Raspberry Pi and
 used tcpdump to log all packets that were sent or received via this
 AP.

 This allowed us to see all the destinations the vehicles were sending data to but not the information within the packets as it was encrypted.

 Photo is not loading `images/test-facility.jpg`

#### Stationary Tests

 Idle Baseline
vehicle on — no activity
 Active Test
perform all possible actions

#### Driving Test

 drive 5–45 mph with acceleration & hard braking

#### Isolating Cellular Traffic

 Photo is not loading `images/faraday-tent.jpg`

 One hypothesis we tested was whether
blocking a vehicle’s ability to communicate over its cellular network
would force more Wi-Fi communication. To block external cellular
signals, we drove 11 EVs in the sample into a car-sized Faraday tent providing ≈93 dB of attenuation, blocking their
 cellular connection entirely. Stationary Idle and Active tests were repeated inside the tent to see whether
 traffic that normally goes out over cellular rerouted to Wi-Fi instead.

### App Testing

 In total, we experimented with 30 connected vehicle
 companion apps that were paired with the vehicles at
 Consumer Reports’s testing facility.

#### Device Setup

 - 01 We used a combination of test phones and iOS versions for our
 experiments: an iPhone 8/iOS 16.6, an iPhone X/iOS 16.7.11, and an
 iPhone 13/iOS 18.5.

 - 02 To minimize background traffic, we deleted all
 non-essential apps on the test phones and tested apps one-by-one,
 including deleting each vehicle app and restarting the phone before
 downloading the next app.

 - 03 We used the iOS native screen recording
 feature to record our interactions with each app for later review.

 - 04 To capture and decrypt network traffic from
 the companion mobile apps, we used iPhones with custom root certificates connected
 to mitmproxy.

#### Process for Testing Each App

 - 01 During app installation and login we accepted all permission requests (e.g., tracking,
 location, calendar access, Bluetooth, notifications) that the application requested

 - 02 We had a Consumer Reports employee log into the app using
 their existing credentials associated with a vehicle on the lot.

 - 03 Once we were logged-in, we manually exercised
 all available functionality, such as looking for nearby charging staions, geolocating the vehicle, viewing vehicle data and service
 history (e.g., tire pressure), viewing notifications (e.g., “doors are
 unlocked”), and viewing in-app privacy policies.

 - 04 Some apps allowed
 us to perform physical interactions on the vehicle, such as remotely
 opening the trunk. We performed all such actions and verified that
 the vehicle completed each request.

## Vehicle Dataset

 $1.2M+
 estimated cost to independently procure this fleet, only possible due to Consumer Reports partnership

 Manufacturer
 Brand
 Year
 Model
 Vehicle Tests

 Driving
 Idle
 In-Tent
 Cellular

 General Motors (GM)
 Buick 2024 Envista ✓ ✓ – –

 Cadillac 2024 Lyriq ✓ ✓ ✓ –
 Chevrolet 2024 Blazer ✓ ✓ ✓ –

 Stellantis
 Dodge 2023 Hornet - ✓ – –

 Fiat 2024 500e ✓ ✓ ✓ –
 RAM 2025 1500 Bighorn ✓ ✓ – –

 Fisker
 Fisker 2023 Ocean ✓ ✓ - –

 Ford Motor Co.
 Ford 2022 F150 Lightning ✓ ✓ - –

 Ford 2024 Mustang GT Fastback ✓ ✓ – –

 Honda Motor Co.
 Honda 2024 Prologue Touring AWD ✓ ✓ ✓ –

 Tata Motors
 Land Rover 2023 Range Rover Sport ✓ ✓ – –

 Toyota Motor Corp.
 Lexus 2024 NX450H+ PHEV ✓ ✓ – –

 Toyota 2023 Corolla Cross ✓ ✓ – –
 Subaru 2023 Solterra ✓ ✓ ✓ –

 Lucid
 Lucid 2023 Air Touring ✓ ✓ ✓ –

 Mercedes-Benz Group AG
 Mercedes 2023 EQS450 4Matic ✓ ✓ - –

 Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance
 Nissan 2023 Ariya Platinum ✓ ✓ ✓ –

 Rivian
 Rivian 2022 R1S ✓ ✓ ✓ –

 Tesla
 Tesla 2024 Cybertruck ✓ ✓ ✓ –

 Tesla 2024 Model 3 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

 Zhejiang Geely Holding Group
 Volvo 2024 C40 ✓ ✓ ✓ –

 * While
 we tested a wide range of vehicles, we did not cover every manufacturer in the U.S. market.
 As with all empirical studies, our results
 should be interpreted as a snapshot in time, and may not generalize
 to vehicles outside our sample or outside the U.S.

## Findings

 - 19 of 21 vehicles contacted at least one third party over Wi-Fi, including known advertising and
 tracking domains

 - 7 of 30 companion apps transmitted sensitive identifiers (VINs, emails, phone numbers, precise
 location) to third parties associated with advertising and tracking.

 Transmiting multiple forms of PII to the same third party allows advertisers to build in-depth profiles on consumers

 All apps
 Only apps with cross-context tracking

 App VIN Location Phone Email

 Click any company chip for what it received and from which app.

 -

 - Pairing a companion app roughly doubled a vehicle's exposure to advertising/tracking companies on
 average, and in some cases added 20+ new ones.

 vehicle-only ATA companies
 - added by the companion mobile app

## Manufacturer Disclosures

 - The team disclosed these findings to the different manufacturers featured in the study, below is an interactve summary of the different explanations received.

 Click any box above for more info.

 - The ongoing theme of all these responses was shifting the blame to the consumer .

 -
 The current system does not give owners the ability to choose.

 Assuming owners can find the particular agreements, if an owner decides they are uncomfortable with the
 data sharing described within them, they are faced with (arguably)
 unfair choices:

 01 accept the agreements regardless of their concerns

 02 stop using their car's connected-vehicle features - which includes remote start, the app, and other very useful features

 03 stop using the vehicle entirely

 - As one notable exception, Honda improved its data
 collection practices to prevent sending precise geolocation to a third
 party associated with user tracking.

## Conclusion

 - We found that vehicles, under a variety of real-world settings,
 contact not only a wide range of first parties (i.e., manufacturer
 domains) and car-specific support parties, but also third parties
 that are known to provide advertising and tracking services.

 - Vehicles from the same manufacturer exhibit
 different network behaviors - this makes it very difficult and expensive to study these vehicles.

 - When adding vehicle companion apps
 to the analysis, we found that vehicle owners are exposed to even
 more privacy-sensitive ATA communication—in some cases more
 than two dozen additional trackers.

 - Our study revealed a large gap between what vehicle
 manufacturers publicly disclosed and how the connected vehicle
 ecosystem actually shares data over the Internet

 - Based on the opaque nature of vehicular
 systems, we argue that there is a need for better transparency to
 ensure increased visibility into the entire ecosystem to identify and
 address corresponding harms.

 © 2026 Northeastern University.
