Paul Battley explains why he is archiving all his Ruby gems: Ruby was once designed for programmer joy and for humans, but with Rails controlled by a figure he opposes and Ruby itself now developed and repositioned around LLM agents, he no longer wants to contribute to a commons being strip-mined to feed AI.
Why I’m no longer updating this repository
by Paul Battley | 2026-10-18
*I’ve decided to archive the source code of my Ruby gems to make it clear
that I’m no longer working on them; I’ve written this post to link from them in
order to explain why.*
For me, the purpose of life is, at least partly, to have joy. Programmers
often feel joy when they can concentrate on the creative side of programming,
so Ruby is designed to make programmers happy.
It was during that era, when Ruby was ostensibly for joy, for creativity, for
humans, that I developed this code. But that age, of doing things for humans,
has passed, and with it my enthusiasm for working on Ruby gems. I won’t say it
was always great, but at least we were working with and for people.
The pre-eminent application of Ruby has been making web applications
using Rails. Rails is open source software but it’s owned and controlled by a
man whose views I find abhorrent, although there is an ongoing
effort to fork it.
To judge by his keynote at Rails World this year – the conference that he
himself set up in pique after he wasn’t invited to RailsConf a couple of years
ago – he is no longer particularly interested in Ruby, Rails, or even
programming itself.
(He’s now using LLM agents to churn out apps in Rust, a language which he
compares to “pouring acid into [his] eyes”, but that’s apparently fine because
he doesn’t even look at what they generate.)
But even beyond Rails, the Ruby language itself is now substantially
developed using LLM agents. Matz is giving talks repositioning Ruby
as a “Programming Language for AI age”, to be emitted by LLM agents,
and stating that to be able to do that LLMs need to consume more good
human-written Ruby code. You might already have seen the problem here.
In that context, I no longer feel inspired to contribute to a commons that’s
being strip-mined by massive corporations to feed the very machines whose
unthinking output pollutes it.
When people claim that it’s no longer sustainable to write code by hand,
they’re not entirely wrong, but only in the same way that it’s no longer
sustainable to sleep in a bed once someone has taken a shit in it.
You want changes? Go ask your agent or something. I’m told that’s what you’re
supposed to do now. I’m out.